I have been studying forcing club systems since reading Good, Better, Best by
Jan Eric Larsson, whose simulations show that forcing club systems tend to
outperform other systems. I believe opening 1♣ for all strong hands is a
superior treatment.
Blueberry Precision Club is a modernized mix of Blue Club, Precision Club,
Cottontail Club, and new ideas from BTU. It is a 4-card major strong club
system. It is highly experimental and subject to change without notice.
- HCP: the well-known Milton Work’s 4321 count
- Total points: HCP + distribution points (void = 3, singleton = 2, doubleton
= 1, subtract 1 for each short suit with HCP)
- Zar: 6-4-2-1 + Zar distribution points (a + b + a - d, where the
letters are the number of cards from the longest to the shortest suit)
- Fifths:
4.0–2.8–1.8–1.0–0.4, adjusted HCP for notrump contracts especially 3NT
- BUM-RAP: 4.5–3–1.5–0.75–0.25, adjusted HCP for suit contracts
- NLTC: Count 1.5–1.0–0.5 losers for each missing AKQ
NLTC is a good single hand evaluator but not very additive. It suits preemptive
initial actions but not for showing supports. I wrote a blog article on
that topic.
I evaluate stopper quality as GIB does.
- Partial stop: length + HCP = 4
- Likely stop: length + HCP = 5
- Stop: A, QJx, or length + HCP at least 7
- Two stops: length + HCP at least 8
Descriptions in bidding tables are dense in information. To make them concise,
I use abbreviations suggested by WBF. Besides, for natural reading
flow, I use usual punctuation marks to connect conditions. Their meanings are
usually self-explanatory in a bidding table.
- The comma (,) works as AND.
- The semicolon (;) works as OR.
- The colon (:) follows general description of the call.
A notable example is the 1♣ opening in Strawberry Polish Club.
This bidding system is a modernized mix of Blue Club and Precision Club.
Blueberry Precision Club also gets idea from:
| - | |
| 1♣! | STR ART, 16+ |
| 1♦ | 11–15, 4+♦; 11–12, BAL 33(xx) by PH |
| 1♥ | 11–15, 4+♥ but not 3433 |
| 1♠ | 11–15, 4+♠ but not 4333 |
| 1NT | 13–15, 2–4♠, 2–4♥, 2–5♦, 2–5♣ |
| 2♣ | 11–15, 6+♣; 11–13, 4M5♣ |
| 2♦! | PRE, 4–10, 6+♠♥ |
| 2♥! | PRE, 4–10, 4–5♠, 4–5♥ |
| 2♠! | PRE, 4–10, 5=♠, 4+♦♣ |
| 2NT! | UNT, 4–10, 5+♦, 5+♣ |
| 3X | PRE, 7+# |
| 3NT! | Gambling, SOL 7+♦♣, 0–1 outside A/K |
| 4♣! | PRE, S-SOL 8+♠♥, 0–1 outside A/K |
| 4♦! | PRE, SOL 8+♠♥, no outside A/K |
| 4M | PRE, 8+# |
| 4NT! | UNT, 6+♦, 6+♣ |
The first two seats do not open these balanced minimum (11–12). The third seat
always does. The fourth seat chooses between 1♦ and pass ad libitum.
| Seat | 11–12, (4333) or (332)5 |
| 1st | P |
| 2nd | P |
| 3rd | 1♦ |
| 4th | 1♦ or P |
The most descriptive 1NT takes priority over all suit openings.
- 5+♠♥, 5+♦♣: Always open the major suit
- Other 5+ 4+: Open the longer eligible suit (MAX 2♣ must contain 6+♣)
- Between 4-card suits:
- ♦ > ♥ > ♠ for the first two seats
- ♥ > ♠ > ♦ for the last two seats
The precedence of 4=♦ depends on the seat. If the seat never opens 1♦ for
(4333), 4=♦ come before 4=♠♥.
- 16–18: 1♣-1♦-1NT
- 19–21: 1♣-1♦-1♥
- 22–24: 1♣-1♦-2NT
- FG: 1♣-1♦-1♥
- 16–21: 1♣-1♥-1NT
- 22–24: 1♣-1♥-2NT
Blueberry employs a novel approach to the strong club opening bid. The 1♥
response is an immediate double negative. This approach is well known for the
strong 2♣ opening in natural systems, but it is uncommon for strong 1♣ systems.
This pioneering method has two main goals:
- 1♣-1♦-1♥ is forcing and accommodates steps on the notrump ladder.
- 1♣-1♥ proposes playing 1♥, more powerful than playing 1♦.
The cost is that 1♦ is now forcing, the contract we seldom play even if
opponents ever let us. The 1NT response also sporadically wrong-sides the
notrump contract. I find slowly showing strong balanced hands OK since these
hands are slow in competition anyway.
| 1♣- | STR ART, 16+ |
| 1♦! | (R), F to 1♠ |
| 1♥! | DBL NEG, 0–4, 0–5♠, 0–4♥, 0–6♦, 0–6♣ |
| 1♠ | FG, 5+♠ |
| 1NT! | FG, 5+♥ |
| 2♣♦ | FG, 5+# |
| 2♥♠! | INV, 4–7, 6+# |
| 2NT! | INV, 5–7, 5+♦, 5+♣ |
| 3♣♦! | INV, 5–7, 7+# |
| 3♥! | INV, 5–7, 5+♥, 5+♠ |
| 3♠! | SOL 7+♦♣, no outside stopper |
| 3NT | 8–11, 33(43) |
| 4♣! | PRE, S-SOL 7+♠♥, 0–1 outside A/K |
| 4♦! | PRE, SOL 7+♠♥, no outside A/K |
| 4♥♠ | PRE, 7+# |
There have been many variants to unfold BAL 19+ at 1♣-1♦-1♥, such as Terrorist’s
Moscito and Viking Precision. All these variants successfully rescue the 2NT
opening from the notrump ladder, freeing 2NT up for preemptive uses. However,
they tend to involve a cryptic relay structure at 1♣-1♦-1♥. I believe that
1♣-1♦-1♥ becomes too crowded when 1♣-1♦ is too negative.
In Blueberry Precision Club, 1♣-1♦ promises a suitable rebid to 1♥. The weak
and relatively balanced hands go to 1♣-1♥.
| 1♣-1♦ | Waiting |
| 1♥! | F, 4+♥ or 19+ |
| 1♠ | 16–21, 4+♠ |
| 1NT | 16–18, BAL |
| 2♣♦ | 16–21, 5+# |
| 2♥♠ | 22–24, 5+# |
| 2NT | 22–24, BAL |
| 3♣♦ | 22–24, 6+# |
| 1♣-1♦ 1♥- | F, 4+♥ or 19+ |
| 1♠ | F, 4+♠ |
| 1NT | INV, 2–3♥ |
| 2♣♦ | INV, 5+# |
| 2♥ | PRE, 5+♥ |
| 2♠ | PRE, usually 6+♠ |
| 2NT | FG, 1–3♥ |
| 3♣♦ | PRE, usually 7+# |
| 3♥ | INV, 4–5♥ |
| 3♠! | FG, BAL 4=♥ |
| 3NT! | FG, UNBAL 4=♥ |
| 1♣-1♥ | NF, 0–4 |
| P | 16–21, 5+♥ or UNBAL 4=♥ |
| 1♠ | 16–21, 5+♠ or UNBAL 4=♠ |
| 1NT | 16–21, BAL |
| 2♣♦ | 16–21, UNBAL 5+# |
| 2♥♠ | 22–24, 5+# |
| 2NT | 22–24, 1–4♠, 1–4♥, 1–5♦, 1–5♣ |
| 3♣♦ | 22–24, 6+# |
| 3♥♠ | FG, 6+# |
Opener can always rebid naturally below 2NT. Rebids of 2NT and above show both
extra strength and more specific distribution.
| 1♣-1♠ | FG, 5+♠ |
| 1NT | (R) |
| 2♣♦♥ | 5+# |
| 2♠ | 3+♠, not 3444 |
| 2NT! | 16–18, 5+♦, 5+♣ |
| 3♣! | 16–18, 5+♣, 5+♥ |
| 3♦! | 16–18, 5+♦, 5+♥ |
| 1♣-1NT | FG, 5+♥ |
| 2♣! | (R) |
| 2♦ | 5+♦ |
| 2♥ | 3+♥, not 4344 |
| 2♠ | 5+♠ |
| 2NT! | 6+♣ |
| 3♣! | 16–18, 5+♣, 5+♠ |
| 3♦! | 16–18, 5+♦, 5+♠ |
| 3♥! | 16–18, 5+♦, 5+♣ |
Slams prefer long fits. Games prefer major suits. To balance between these goals,
I suggest the following precedence for rebids:
- 4-card support
- 5-card new suit
- 3-card support
| 1♣-2♣ | FG, 5+♣ |
| 2♦! | (R) |
| 2♥♠ | 5+# |
| 2NT! | 6+♦ |
| 3♣ | 3+♣ |
| 3♦! | 16–18, 5+♦, 5+♥ |
| 3♥! | 16–18, 5+♥, 5+♠ |
| 3♠! | 16–18, 5+♠, 5+♦ |
| 1♣-2♦ | FG, 5+♦ |
| 2♥! | (R) |
| 2♠ | 5+♠ |
| 2NT! | 5+♥ |
| 3♣ | 5+♣ |
| 3♦ | 3+♦ |
| 3♥! | 16–18, 5+♥, 5+♣ |
| 3♠! | 16–18, 5+♠, 5+♣ |
| 3NT! | 16–18, 5+♠, 5+♥ |
- MIN (11–13): 4+♦, but 2+♦ by passed hand
- MAX (13–15): unbalanced 4+♦
| 1♦- | 11–15, 4+♦ |
| 1♥♠ | F, 4+# |
| 1NT | NF, 8–10 |
| 2♣ | INV+, 4+♣ |
| 2♦! | LIM+, 4+♦ |
| 2♥! | CONST P/C, 4–5♥, 5=♠ |
| 2♠! | INV, 5–6♠, 4=♥ |
| 2NT | BAL INV, 11–12 |
| 3♣! | CONST, 8–10, 5+♦ |
| 3♦! | PRE, 0–7, 5+♦ |
| 3♥♠! | SPL, 0–1#, 4+♦ |
By passed hand, 1♦ contains a weak notrump.
| P-1♦- | 11–15, 2+♦ |
| 2♠! | PRE, 6+♣; BAL INV |
| 2NT! | PRE, 6+♦ |
| 3♣♦ | INV, 6+# |
The responses 1♦-1♥♠ show 4+ cards just like most natural systems.
| 1♦-1♥ | 4+♥ |
| 1♠ | 4+♠ |
| 1NT | BAL MIN, 4–5♦ |
| 2♣ | MIN, 4+♣ |
| 2♦ | MIN, 6+♦ |
| 2♥ | MIN, 4+♥ |
| 2♠! | MAX, 6+♦, ♦AJT+ or 7+♦ |
| 2NT! | MAX, 6=♦, ≤ ♦AJ9 |
| 3♣ | MAX, 5+♣ |
| 3♦! | MAX, 6+♦, 3=♥ |
| 3♥ | MAX, 4+♥, 5+♦ |
| 4♦ | MAX, 4+♥, 6+♦ |
| 1♦-1♠ | 4+♠ |
| 1NT | BAL MIN, 4–5♦ |
| 2♣ | UNBAL, 3+♣ |
| 2♦ | MIN, 6+♦ |
| 2♥ | 4+♥, 5+♦, MAX or 3451 |
| 2♠ | MIN, 4+♠ |
| 2NT! | MAX, 6+♦, 0–2♠ |
| 3♣ | MAX, 5+♣ |
| 3♦! | MAX, 6+♦, 3=♠ |
| 3♠ | MAX, 4+♠, 5+♦ |
| 4♦ | MAX, 4+♠, 6+♦ |
We use BTU-style 3-way checkback to an XYZ auction. There are 3 artificial
relays in the 3-way checkback:
- 2♣: several variants:
- to play 2X
- strongly shaped invitation
- balanced invitation or choice of games
- 2♦: game-forcing checkback, usually a choice of games
- 2NT: transfer to clubs
As a corollary, natural 2X are wide-range invitations and 3X become slam tries.
| 1♦-1♥ 1♠- | 4+♠ |
| 1NT | MIN, 0–3♠, 4–5♥, 0–3♦ |
| 2♣! | BTU CB, F1 |
| 2♦! | FG CB |
| 2♥ | INV, 5+♥ |
| 2♠ | INV, 4+♠ |
| 2NT! | TRF, PRE or FG, 6+♣ |
| 3♣ | S/T, 5+♣, 5+♥ |
| 3♦ | S/T, 4+♦, 5+♥ |
| 3♥ | S/T, 6+♥ |
| 3♠ | S/T, 4+♠ |
| 1♦-1♥ 1♠-1NT | NAT MIN |
| 2♣ | NF, 4=♣ |
| 2♦ | NF, 6+♦ |
| 2♥ | INV, 3=♥ |
| 2♠ | INV, 5+♠, 6+♦ |
| 2NT | NAT INV |
| 3♣ | FG, 4=♣ |
| 3♦ | FG, 6+♦ |
| 3♥ | FG, 3=♥ |
| 1♦-1♥ 1♠-2♣ | BTU CB |
| 2♦ | MIN |
| 2♥ | MAX, 3=♥ |
| 2♠ | MAX, at most partial stop in ♣ |
| 2NT | MAX, likely stop in ♣ |
| 3♣ | MAX, 4054 |
| 3♦ | MAX, 6+♦ |
| 1♦-1♥ 1♠-2♣ 2♦- | MIN |
| 2♥ | S/O, UNBAL 5+♥ |
| 2♠ | S/O, 4+♠ |
| 2NT | BAL INV |
| 3♣ | INV, 6+♣ |
| 3♦ | INV, 4+♦ |
| 3♥ | INV, S-SOL 6+♥ |
| 3♠ | INV, 4+♠, 5+♥ |
| 1♦-1♥ 1NT- | BAL MIN |
| 2♣! | BTU CB, F1 |
| 2♣ 2♦ | P/C |
| 2♣ 2♥ | MAX, 3=♥ |
| 2♦! | FG CB |
| 2♥ | INV, 5+♥ |
| 2♠ | INV, 4+♠ |
| 2NT! | TRF, PRE or FG, 6+♣ |
| 3♣ | S/T, 5+♣, 5+♥ |
| 3♦ | S/T, 4+♦, 5+♥ |
| 3♥ | S/T, 6+♥ |
| 3♠! | SPL, 0–1♠, 6+♥ |
| 4♣! | SPL, 0–1♣, 6+♥ |
| 4♦ | FG, 4+♦, 6+♥ |
| 1♦-1♥ 1NT-2♣ 2♦- | P/C |
| 2♥ | S/O, 5+♥ |
| 2♠ | INV, 4+♠, 6+♥ |
| 2NT | BAL INV |
| 3♣ | INV, 6+♣ |
| 3♦ | INV, 4+♦ |
| 3♥ | INV, S-SOL 6+♥ |
| 1♦-1♠ 1NT- | BAL MIN |
| 2♣! | BTU CB, F1 |
| 2♣ 2♦ | P/C |
| 2♣ 2♥ | MAX, 4+♥ |
| 2♣ 2♠ | MAX, 3=♠ |
| 2♦! | FG CB |
| 2♥ | INV, 4+♥, 5+♠ |
| 2♠ | INV, 5+♠ |
| 2NT | TRF, PRE or FG, 6+♣ |
| 3♣ | S/T, 5+♣, 5+♠ |
| 3♦ | S/T, 5+♦, 5+♠ |
| 3♥ | S/T, 5+♥, 5+♠ |
| 3♠ | S/T, 6+♠ |
| 3NT | 12–15, 4=♠ |
| 4♣! | SPL, 0–1♣, 6+♠ |
| 4♦ | FG, 4+♦, 6+♠ |
| 4♥! | SPL, 0–1♥, 6+♠ |
| 1♦-1♠ 1NT-2♣ 2♦- | P/C |
| 2♥ | MIN, 4+♥, 5+♠ |
| 2♠ | S/O, 5+♠ |
| 2NT | BAL INV |
| 3♣ | INV, 6+♣ |
| 3♦ | INV, 6+♦ |
| 3♥ | INV, 5+♥, 5+♠ |
| 3♠ | INV, S-SOL 6+♠ |
For a precise game try, we sacrifice 2NT as Lebensohl to park minimum hands.
| 1♦-1♠ 2♥- | 4+♥, 5+♦, MAX or 3451 |
| 2♠ | NF, 5+♠ |
| 2NT! | LEB, non-FG |
| 3♣! | 4SFG |
| 3♦ | FG, 3+♦ |
| 3♥ | FG, 4+♥ |
| 3♠ | FG, 6+♠ |
- MIN (11–13): 4+♥ but not 4333
- MAX (13–15): 5+♥ or unbalanced 4=♥ 5+♣
| 1♥- | 11–15, 4+♥ |
| 1♠ | F, 4+♠ |
| 1NT | NF, usually 8–11, 0–3♠, 0–3♥ |
| 2♣♦ | INV+, 4+# |
| 2♥ | PRE, 4+♥; CONST, 3=♥ |
| 2♠! | PRE, 6+♠ |
| 2NT! | INV+, 4+♥ |
| 3♣♦! | SPL, INV or S/T, 0–1#, 4+♥ |
| 3♥! | CONST, 4–5♥ |
| 3NT! | COG, 33(43) |
| 3♠!, 4♣♦! | S/T SPL, 0–1#, 4+♥ |
| 4♥♠ | S/O |
| 4NT! | RKCB 1430 |
Raises become more constructive because everyone had a chance to bid.
Opener can pass invitations with a mimimum 7–8-card fit. The unlisted rebids
below 3NT are natural game forces.
| P-1♥- | 11–15, 4+♥ |
| 2♣♦ | INV, 5+# |
| 2♥ | CONST, 3+♥ |
| 3♥ | INV, 4+♥ |
Opener may rebid a 3-card minor due to protection from the impossible 2♠.
| 1♥-1NT | CONST–INV, 0–3♠, 0–3♥ |
| 2♣ | 5+♥, 3+♣ or BAL 13–15 |
| 2♦ | 5+♥, UNBAL 3+♦ |
| 2♥ | MIN, 6+♥ |
| 2♠ | MAX, 4+♠, 5+♥ |
| 2NT | MAX, 6=♥, ≤ ♥AJ9 |
| 3♣ | MAX, 5+♣, 4+♥ |
| 3♦ | MAX, 5+♦, 5+♥ |
| 3♥ | MAX, 6+♥, AJT+ or 7+♥ |
| 3NT! | MAX P/C, 6+♦♣, 4=♥ |
| 3♠, 4♣♦ | MAX, 5+#, 6+♥ |
Just like Strawberry 1♠-1NT, the threshold of suit
quality is based on Binky Points.
I import responses from Standard Modern Precision. Its Jacoby 2NT variant
better fits the limited major suit opening.
| 1♥-2NT | FG, 4+♥ |
| 3♣! | (R) MAX |
| 3♦! | INV, 5+♥ |
| 3♥ | BAL MIN |
| 3♠! | MIN SPL, 0–1♠ |
| 3NT! | MIN SPL, 0–1♦ |
| 4♣! | MIN SPL, 0–1♣ |
| 4♦ | MIN, 5+♦, 5+♥ |
| 4♥! | MIN, 4+♠, 6+♥ |
| 1♥-2NT 3♣- | (R) MAX |
| 3♦! | S/T, ask for distribution |
| 3♥ | S/T, ask for CTRL |
| 3♠! | S/T SPL, 0–1♠ |
| 3NT! | S/T SPL, 0–1♦ |
| 4♣! | S/T SPL, 0–1♣ |
- MIN (11–13): 4+♠ but not 4333 or 44(xx)
- MAX (13–15): 5+♠ or unbalanced 4=♠ 5+♣
| 1♠- | 11–15, 4+♠ |
| 1NT | NF, usually 8–11, 0–3♠ |
| 2♣ | INV+, 3+♣ |
| 2♦ | INV+, 4+♦ |
| 2♥ | INV+, 5+♥ |
| 2♠ | PRE, 4+♠; CONST, 3=♠ |
| 2NT! | INV+, 4+♠ |
| 3♣♦! | SPL, INV or S/T, 0–1#, 4+♠ |
| 3♥! | INV, 6+♥, 3=♠ |
| 3♠! | CONST, 4–5♠ |
| 3NT! | COG, 3(433) |
| 4X! | S/T SPL, 0–1#, 4+♠ |
| 4♠ | S/O |
| 4NT! | RKCB 1430 |
New suits by passed hand are completely natural. It limits the benefit of the
2♣ transfer to hearts that responder fails to preempt. The natural 2♣ also
proposes a reasonable contract. Raises become more constructive because everyone
had a chance to bid.
Opener can pass invitations with a mimimum 7–8-card fit. The unlisted
rebids below 3NT are natural game forces.
| P-1♠- | 11–15, 4+♠ |
| 2X | INV, 5+# |
| 2♠ | CONST, 3+♠ |
| 3♠ | INV, 4+♠ |
| P-1♠-2♣ | INV, 5+♣ |
| 2♦! | MIN, 5=♠ |
| 2♥ | MIN, 4+♥, 5+♠ |
| 2♠ | MIN, 6+♠ |
| 3♣ | MIN, 3+♣, 4=♠ |
| P-1♠-2♦ | INV, 5+♦ |
| 2♥! | MIN, 5=♠ |
| 2♠ | MIN, 6+♠ |
| 3♦ | MIN, 3+♦, 4=♠ |
| P-1♠-2♥ | INV, 5+♥ |
| 2♠ | MIN, 6+♠ |
| 2NT | MIN, 5=♠ |
| 3♥ | MIN, 3+♥ |
Opener passes with balanced minimum.
| 1♠-1NT | CONST–INV, 0–3♠ |
| 2♣ | 5+♠, 4+♣ or BAL 13–15 |
| 2♦♥ | 5+♠, 4+# |
| 2♠ | MIN, 6+♠ |
| 2NT! | MAX, 6=♠, ≤ ♠AJ9 |
| 3♣ | MAX, 5+♣, 4+♠ |
| 3♦♥ | MAX, 5+#, 5+♠ |
| 3♠ | MAX, 6+♠, AJT+ or 7+♠ |
| 3NT! | MAX P/C, 6+♣, 4=♠ |
| 4X | MAX, 5+#, 6+♠ |
Just like Strawberry 1♠-1NT, the threshold of suit
quality is based on Binky Points.
I import responses from Standard Modern Precision. Its Jacoby 2NT variant
better fits the limited major suit opening.
| 1♠-2NT | FG, 4+♠ |
| 3♣! | (R) MAX |
| 3♦! | INV, 5+♠ |
| 3♥! | MIN SPL, 0–1♥ |
| 3♠ | BAL MIN |
| 3NT! | MIN SPL, 0–1♦ |
| 4♣! | MIN SPL, 0–1♣ |
| 4♦ | MIN, 5+♦, 5+♠ |
| 4♥ | MIN, 5+♥, 5+♠ |
| 4♠! | MAX, 5+♥, 5+♠ |
| 1♠-2NT 3♣- | (R) MAX |
| 3♦! | S/T, ask for distribution |
| 3♥! | S/T SPL, 0–1♥ |
| 3♠ | S/T, ask for CTRL |
| 3NT! | S/T SPL, 0–1♦ |
| 4♣! | S/T SPL, 0–1♣ |
This bidding system has a strong notrump opening that does not contain a 5-card
major. We use the BTU continuations after the 1NT opening: Stayman takes care
of invitation with 5+ spades.
| 1NT- | BAL 15–17 |
| 2♣! | (Garbage) STAY; INV 5=♠ |
| 2♦! | TRF, 5+♥ |
| 2♥! | TRF, 5+♠ |
| 2♠! | 6+♣; BAL INV; S/T, 5+ 4+ minors |
| 2NT! | 5+♦, 4+♣ or 6+♦ |
| 3♣! | INV, 6+♣, KQxxxx or better, usually 6–7 HCP |
| 3♦! | INV+, 5+♠, 5+♥ |
| 3♥! | SPL, 0–1♥, 0–3♠, 4–6♦, 4–6♣ |
| 3♠! | SPL, 0–1♠, 0–3♥, 4–6♦, 4–6♣ |
| 3NT | S/O |
| 4♣! | Gerber BW |
| 4♦! | Texas TRF, 6+♥ |
| 4♥! | Texas TRF, 6+♠ |
| 4♠! | F QUANT |
| 4NT | QUANT INV to 6NT, NF |
| 5NT | QUANT INV to 7NT, F |
| 1NT-2♠ | 6+♣; BAL INV; S/T, 5+♣, 4+♦ |
| 2NT | MIN |
| 3♣! | MAX, 1–3♣ |
| 3♦♥♠! | MAX, 4–6♣, good stopper |
| 1NT-2NT | 5+♦, 4+♣ or 6+♦ |
| 3♣! | 1–2♦ |
| 3♦ | 3–4♦ |
| 3♥♠! | 5–6♦, good stopper |
| 3NT! | 5–6♦, good ♣ stopper |
BTU reuses 4♠ for QUANT. This fills the blank that Gerber and Texas leave.
Standard QUANT usually invites the upper 1/2 to 2/3 of the opening range. This
4♠ serves as a narrower QUANT than 4NT or 5NT by only inviting the top 1/3.
| 1NT-4NT | QUANT INV to 6NT |
| 6NT | S/O, 16–17 HCP |
| 1NT-5NT | QUANT INV to 7NT |
| 6NT | S/O, 15 HCP |
| 7NT | S/O, 16–17 HCP |
| 1NT-4♠ | F QUANT |
| 4NT | 15–16 HCP |
| 4NT-5NT! | F to a 5-card suit or 6NT |
| 4NT-7♣! | P/C to a 5-card suit or 7NT |
| 6NT | 17 HCP |
- Weak: Transfer to the better major suit. Give up on the other one.
- Invitational: Bid 3♦.
- Choice of games: Bid 3♦ most of the time. Transfer to spades and then
bid 4♥ if you prefer 4♠ > 4♥ > 3NT.
- Slam try: Transfer to spades and then bid 3♥.
BTU Stayman is characterized by including invitations of 5= spades. All its
variants are:
- Weak: T/O with short clubs (Garbage Stayman)
- Invitational: 4–5♠ (BTU) or 4=♥
- Game-forcing: 4=♠ or 4=♥
| 1NT-2♣ | BTU STAY |
| 2♦! | 2–3♠, 2–3♥ |
| 2♥ | 4=♥, 2–3♠ |
| 2♠ | 4=♠, 2–3♥ |
| 2NT! | MIN, 44(xx) |
| 3♣! | MAX, 44(xx) |
- Smolen at both levels takes care of spade invitation.
- Second responses above 3NT remain the same, assuming misfit.
| 1NT-2♣ 2♦- | NEG |
| 2♥! | TRF INV, 5+♠ |
| 2♠! | NF INV Smolen, 4=♠, 5+♥ |
| 2NT | NAT INV |
| 3♣ | FG, 5+♣ |
| 3♦ | FG, 5+♦ |
| 3♥! | FG, Smolen TRF, 54(xx) |
| 3♠! | FG, Smolen TRF, 45(xx) |
| 4♣! | Gerber BW |
| 4♦! | Texas TRF, 6+♥, 4=♠ |
| 4♥! | Texas TRF, 6+♠, 4=♥ |
| 4♠! | F QUANT |
| 4NT | QUANT INV to 6NT |
| 5NT | QUANT INV to 7NT |
| 1NT-2♣ 2♦-2♥ | INV, 5+♠ |
| 2♠ | MIN |
| 2NT | INV, 2=♠ |
| 3♣♦! | INV, 3=♠, 5+# |
| 3♥! | INV, 3=♠, good 4+♥ |
| 3♠ | INV, 3=♠ |
- BTU QUANT scheme remains, assuming misfit.
- 3♠ is a generic fit S/T, so 4NT is QUANT instead of RKCB.
| 1NT-2♣ 2♥- | 4=♥, 2–3♠ |
| 2♠ | INV, 5+♠ |
| 2NT | INV, 0–3♥, 4=♠ |
| 3♣ | FG, 5+♣, 0–3♥, 4=♠ |
| 3♦ | FG, 5+♦, 0–3♥, 4=♠ |
| 3♥ | INV, 4+♥ |
| 3♠! | S/T, 4+♥ |
| 4♣♦! | S/T SPL, 0–1#, 4+♥ |
| 4♠! | F QUANT |
| 4NT | QUANT INV to 6NT |
| 5NT | QUANT INV to 7NT |
| 1NT-2♣ 2♥-2♠ | INV, 5+♠ |
| 2NT | INV, 2=♠ |
| 3♣♦! | INV, 3=♠, 5+# |
| 3♥! | INV, 3=♠, good 4+♥ |
| 3♠ | INV, 3=♠ |
- Only standard QUANT scheme remains. Now 4♠ is S/O.
- 3♥ is a generic fit S/T, so 4NT is QUANT instead of RKCB.
| 1NT-2♣ 2♠- | 4=♠, 2–3♥ |
| 2NT | INV, 0–3♠, 4=♥ |
| 3♣ | FG, 5+♣, 0–3♠, 4=♥ |
| 3♦ | FG, 5+♦, 0–3♠, 4=♥ |
| 3♥! | S/T, 4+♠ |
| 3♠ | INV, 4+♠ |
| 4♣♦♥! | S/T SPL, 0–1#, 4+♠ |
| 4♠ | S/O, 4+♠ |
| 4NT | QUANT INV to 6NT |
| 5NT | QUANT INV to 7NT |
BTU Jacoby transfers are characterized by subsequent forcing relays. Thanks to
moving spade invitation to Stayman, we enjoy one more step to separate slam try
from choice of games.
Opener super-accepts with maximum 4-card support. To help game try, opener
tries to show (4333) or a good side suit.
Responder rebids forcing 2♠ for a 5=♥ invitation. This forcing bid allows
invitation by distribution, e.g. 5=♥ 5+♦♣.
| 1NT-2♦ | 5+♥ |
| 2♥ | (R) |
| 2♠! | MAX, 4=♠, 4=♥ |
| 2NT | MAX, 3433 |
| 3♣! | MAX, good 4+♣, 4=♥ |
| 3♦! | MAX, good 4+♦, 4=♥ |
| 3♥ | MAX, 4=♥, none of the above |
| 1NT-2♦ 2♥- | - |
| 2♠! | F INV, 5=♥ |
| 2NT! | UNBAL FG |
| 3♣! | S/T, 4+♣ |
| 3♦! | S/T, 4+♦ |
| 3♥ | INV, 6+♥ |
| 3NT | BAL P/C |
| 3♠!, 4♣♦! | SPL, 0–1#, 6+♥ |
| 4♥ | Mild S/T, 6+♥ |
| 4♠! | F QUANT |
| 4NT | QUANT INV to 6NT |
| 5NT | QUANT INV to 7NT |
| 1NT-2♦ 2♥-2♠ | INV, 5=♥ |
| 2NT | MIN, 15 HCP, 2=♥ |
| 3♣! | P/C, 16 HCP, 2=♥ |
| 3♦! | P/C, 16 HCP, 2=♥, 5+♣ |
| 3♥ | MIN, 3=♥ |
| 3NT | S/O, 17 HCP, 2=♥ |
With 5=♠ invitation moved to Stayman, 5=♠ hands here are either weak or game
forcing.
| 1NT-2♥ | 5+♠ |
| 2♠ | (R) |
| 2NT! | MAX, 4333 |
| 3♣! | MAX, good 4+♣, 4=♠ |
| 3♦! | MAX, good 4+♦, 4=♠ |
| 3♥! | MAX, 4=♥, 4=♠ |
| 3♠ | MAX, 4=♠, none of the above |
| 1NT-2♥ 2♠- | - |
| 2NT! | UNBAL FG |
| 3♣! | S/T, 4+♣ |
| 3♦! | S/T, 4+♦ |
| 3♥! | S/T, 5+♥ |
| 3♠ | INV, 6+♠ |
| 3NT | BAL P/C |
| 4♣♦! | SPL, 0–1#, 6+♠ |
| 4♥ | COG, 5+♥, prefer 4♠ > 4♥ |
| 4♠ | Mild S/T, 6+♠ |
| 4NT | QUANT INV to 6NT |
| 5NT | QUANT INV to 7NT |
I suggest Terrorist’s runout regardless of what (X) means. This runout
also applies to a conventional double, yet responder can also pass balanced
hands more often.
| 1NT (X) | - |
| XX | PEN |
| 2♣! | P/C, 5+♣ or 4+♦ 4+♠♥ |
| 2♦! | P/C, 5+♦ or 4+♠ 4+♥ |
| 2M | NF, 5+# |
| 2NT! | CUE, good unbalanced hand |
| 3X | PRE, 6+# |
Opener often runs with clubs because it is hard for responder to do so.
| 1NT (X) P | - |
| XX | 5+ suit |
| 2♣! | 4+♣, 4+ another suit |
Systems on is a decent approach over 1NT (2♣︎). The overcall is somewhat
ignored, and X replaces the stolen bid of 2♣. Since continuations to 1NT is
major suit oriented, it is crucial if (2♣) shows a major suit.
This kind of 2♣︎ requires extra care. I recommend BTU vs Unusual.
| 1NT (2♣) | Both majors |
| X | PEN for either major |
| 2♦ | NF, 5+♦ |
| 2♥! | FG, 5+♦ |
| 2♠! | INV+, 5+♣ |
| 2NT! | LEB, PRE 6+♣ or FG (xx)45 |
| 3♣♦ | INV, 6+# |
| 3♥♠! | Ask for stopper in this suit |
This position is analogous to (1M) 1NT. X replaces
the Gladiator 2♣.
Ignore the (2♣) overcall. X replaces the Stayman 2♣ as usual.
Rubinsohl covers these auctions.
BTU vs Unusual suffices.
| 1NT (2NT) | 5+♦, 5+♣ |
| X | PEN |
| 3♣! | INV+, 5+♠ |
| 3♦! | INV+, 5+♥ |
| 3♥♠ | NF, 5+# |
| 3NT | S/O |
| 4♣! | COG, 4+♠, 5+♥ |
| 2♣- | 11–15, 5+♣, 4+♠♥ or 6+♣ |
| 2♦! | (R), STAY or FG |
| 2M | NF, 5+# |
| 2NT! | LEB, PRE 3+♣ or FG 5+ 5+ non-♣ |
| 3♣ | LIM, 3+♣ |
| 3X | INV, 6+# |
| 4♣ | PRE, usually 4+♣ |
This relay asks for 4-card majors and strength.
| 2♣-2♦ | STAY or FG |
| 2♥♠ | 11–13, 4+# |
| 2NT | 11–13, 6+♣, 0–3♠, 0–3♥ |
| 3♣ | 14–15, 6+♣, 0–3♠, 0–3♥ |
| 3♦♥♠ | 14–15, 4+#, 6+♣ |
To differentiate between 5-card and 6-card majors, responder directly rebids a
6-card major but relays to ask for 3-card support.
The 2NT relay asks for a 3-card side suit.
| 2♣-2♦ 2M- | 11–13, 4+# |
| 2♠ | NF, 4+♠ |
| 2NT! | (R), FG |
| 3♣ | NF, 3+♣ |
| 3♦, 3OM | FG, 6+# |
| 3M | NF, 4+# |
Unlike most variants of Precision, I reassign opener’s 3♣ to the most common (5422).
There is no space left for an invitational 2NT at 2♣-2♦-2♠. Responder must take
this into account when inviting with 4=♥.
| 2♣-2♦ 2M-2NT | (R) |
| 3♣! | 4225 |
| 3♦, 3OM | 3=# |
| 3M! | FRAG, 6+♣, 0–1OM |
| 3NT! | FRAG, 6+♣, 0–1♦ |
The 3♦ relay asks for a 3-card side suit.
| 2♣-2♦ [2NT, 3♣]- | 6+♣, 0–3♠, 0–3♥ |
| 3♣ | NF, 2+♣ |
| 3♦! | (R), FG |
| 3M | FG, 6+# |
| 2♣-2♦ [2NT, 3♣]-3♦ | (R) |
| 3M | 3=# |
| 3NT | 0–2♠, 0–2♥ |
As opener has shown 10 cards, the cheapest suit becomes a relay that asks for
shortness.
| 2♣-2♦ 3♦- | 14–15, 4+♦, 6+♣ |
| 3♥! | (R) |
| 3♥ 3♠! | SPL, 0–1♠ |
| 3♠ 3NT! | SPL, 0–1♥ |
| 2♣-2♦ 3♥- | 14–15, 4+♥, 6+♣ |
| 3♠! | (R) |
| 3♠ 3NT! | SPL, 0–1♠ |
| 3♠ 4♣! | SPL, 0–1♦ |
| 2♣-2♦ 3♠- | 14–15, 4+♠, 6+♣ |
| 4♣! | (R) |
| 4♣ 4♦! | SPL, 0–1♦ |
| 4♦ 4♥! | SPL, 0–1♥ |
| 2♣-2NT 3♣- | (R) |
| P | PRE, 3+♣ |
| 3♦! | FG, 5+♦, 5+♥ |
| 3♥! | FG, 5+♥, 5+♠ |
| 3♠! | FG, 5+♠, 5+♦ |
| 2♣ (X) | - |
| XX | PEN, BAL INV+, 2–3♣ |
| 2♦ | (R), STAY or FG |
| 2M | NF, 5+# |
| 2NT! | LEB, PRE 3+♣ or FG 5+ 5+ non-♣ |
| 3♣ | LIM, 3+♣ |
| 3X | INV, 6+# |
| 2♣ (2X) | - |
| X! | T/O, STAY or FG |
| 2M | NF, 5+# |
| 2NT! | LEB, PRE 3+♣ or FG 5+ 5+ non-♣ |
| 3♣ | LIM, 3+♣ |
| 2♣ (2♦) | - |
| 3♦! | INV+, 6+♥ |
| 3♥! | INV+, 6+♠ |
| 3♠! | FG, ask for stopper |
| 2♣ (2♥) | - |
| 3♦ | INV, 6+♦ |
| 3♥! | INV+, 6+♠ |
| 3♠! | FG, ask for stopper |
| 2♣ (2♠) | - |
| 3♦♥ | INV, 6+# |
| 3♠! | FG, 6+♥ |
Multi 2♦ shows a 6-card weak two of either major.
| 2♦- | PRE, 6+♠♥ |
| 2M! | P/C |
| 2NT! | (R) INV+ |
| 3♣♦ | NAT F |
| 3M! | P/C |
| 3NT | S/O |
| 4♣! | STR choice of games |
| 4♦! | PRE choice of games |
| 4M | S/O |
| 2♦-2NT | INV+ |
| 3♣! | MAX, 6+♥ |
| 3♦! | MAX, 6+♠ |
| 3♥ | MIN, 6+♥ |
| 3♠ | MIN, 6+♠ |
There are two kinds of choice of games:
- 4♣ by strength
- 4♦ by distribution
Such distinction helps judging how to react to interference. Besides, 4♣ lets
the strong hand declare. On the other hand, 4♦ closes the auction ASAP.
| 2♦-4♣ | STR choice of games |
| 4♦! | TRF, 6+♥ |
| 4♥! | TRF, 6+♠ |
| 2♦-4♦ | PRE choice of games |
| 4M | To play, 6+# |
The related 2♦={both majors} opening is known as Ekren or Ekrens after the
Norwegian grand master who invented it. Bjørn Olaf Ekren prefers the 2♦
incarnation should not bear his name.
—Bridge: 2♥ as weak in both majors, Chris Ryall
I prefer BTU Terrorist’s continuations.
| 2♥- | PRE, 4+♥, 4+♠ |
| 2NT | NAT INV |
| 3♣! | INV+, 3+♠ |
| 3♦! | INV+, 3+♥ |
| 3NT | S/O |
| 4♣♦ | NAT S/T |
| 2♥-3♣ | INV+, 3+♠ |
| 3♦! | MIN, 4=♠ |
| 3♥ | MAX, 5+♥ |
| 3♠ | MIN, 5+♠ |
| 3NT | MAX, 44(xx) |
| 4♣+ | MAX, 5+♠ |
| 2♥-3♦ | INV+, 3+♥ |
| 3♥ | MIN |
| 3♠! | MAX, 4=♥ |
| 3NT+ | MAX, 5+♥ |
Muiderberg shows exactly 5 cards in the bid major and a side minor suit.
Multi 2♦ already takes care of 6+ cards.
| 2♠- | PRE, 5=♠, 4+♦♣ |
| 2NT! | INV+, ask for the minor suit |
| 3♣! | P/C |
| 3♦! | INV+, 3+ SUPP |
| 2♠-2NT | (R) INV+ |
| 3♣ | MIN, 4+♣ |
| 3♦ | MIN, 4+♦ |
| 3♥! | MAX, 4=♣ |
| 3♠! | MAX, 4=♦ |
| 3NT! | MAX, 5+♦ |
| 4♣ | MAX, 5+♣ |
The unusual 2NT opening is a preempt with 5+♦ and 5+♣. Bidding all strong hands
with 1♣ frees up 2NT as a preempt.
I advise not opening 2NT for (30)55 in the first two seats.
| 2NT- | PRE, 5+♦, 5+♣ |
| 3♣♦ | S/O |
| 3♥! | (R) FG |
| 3♠! | PUP, S/T or UNBAL INV |
| 3NT, 4X | S/O |
| 4NT! | Equal preference between 5♣♦ |
| 2NT-3♥ | (R) FG |
| 3♠! | SPL, 0–1♠ |
| 3NT! | SPL, 0–1♥ |
| 4♣ | MAX 1156 |
| 4♦ | MAX 1165 |
| 2NT-3♥ 4♣♦- | MAX 11(65) |
| 4♥! | RKCB in ♣ |
| 4♠! | RKCB in ♦ |
| 4NT | S/O |
| 2NT-3♠ 3NT- | (R) |
| 4♣ | INV, 3+♣ |
| 4♦ | INV, 3+♦ |
| 5♣! | S/T, 3+♣ |
| 5♦! | S/T, 3+♦ |
BTU uses a 4X scheme that conveys ~0.58 more bits than traditional or Meckwell
Namyats.
- 4♣: solid major suit without any outside A/K
- 4♦: semi-solid major suit with 0–1 outside A/K
- 4M: non-solid (1.5+ NLTC) major suit
| 4X- | PRE in 4M |
| 4NT! | RKCB |
| 5m! | CTRL ASK |
| 4X-5m | CTRL ASK |
| +1 | No CTRL |
| +2 | K or singleton |
| +3 | A or void |
| 4♣♦- | (S-)SOL PRE in 4M |
| 4♦! | (R) S/T |
| 4M!, 5M!, 6M! | P/C |
| 4♣-4♦ | (R) S/T |
| 4M | NAT MIN |
| 4NT! | MAX, CTRL in every side suit |
| 5♣! | MAX, no CTRL in ♣ |
| 5♦! | MAX, no CTRL in ♦ |
| 5M! | MAX, no CTRL in OM |