Mijumaru Blue Club
Welcome to Mijumaru Blue Club! This bidding system is largely based on Blue
Club. Changes are made with my improvisation.
Notable differences from the original Blue Club
Strong opening auctions are one point lower.
-
1
♣
: 16+ HCP (17+ balanced)
-
Reverses: 14–15 HCP
The 1NT opening is 14–16 HCP to fit the ranges above. Modern 3-point ranged
strong notrump works better than a weak or wide-ranged one.
The precedence for opening a 4-card suit is
♥
>
♠
>
♦
. Opening 1
♥
for 44
in majors provides better constructiveness.
We don't care about suit quality in constructive bidding. Non-forcing raises
are mixed to some extent. There is either extra strength or a good fit, but
not both.
Nebulous 2/1 responses are natural game forces or something constructive with
a major suit, yet 1
♠
-2
♥
is a negative free bid.
The responses to 1
♣
are natural Polish-like instead of control-showing. MAFIA
applies to minimum game force.
References
-
Jan Eric Larsson.
Good, Better, Best: A comparison of bridge bidding
systems and conventions by computer simulation.
ISBN 978-1771402415
-
Daniel Neill.
Standard Modern Precision: Getting from Here to There.
ISBN
978-1771401791
-
Jan Eric Larsson, Anu Uus, and George Wang.
[Kaninklöver / Cottontail Club: A Cheatsheet (2022)](https://github.com/Egroegw/Kaninklover)
-
Bo-Yin Yang.
[Terrorist's Moscito, or Major-Oriented Strong Club, with Interpid Two Openers](https://bridgewithdan.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/terr_mosc.pdf)
-
Arturo Franco, Marco Pancotti, and Daniel J. Neill.
[Blue Team Club](https://bridgewithdan.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/BTC2000_gmeier.pdf)
-
Edward Piwowar.
[PC - Meckwell Lite Precision Club](https://sites.google.com/view/bbaenglish/description-of-systems/pc-meckwell-lite-precision-club)
Hand evaluation
-
High card points (HCP)
: the well-known Milton Work's 4321 count
-
Total points
: HCP + distribution points (void = 3, singleton = 2, doubleton
= 1, subtract 1 for each short suit with HCP)
-
Zar points (ZP)
: 6-4-2-1 + Zar distribution points (a + b + a - d, where the
letters are the number of cards from the longest to the shortest suit)
-
Fifths
: 4.0–2.8–1.8–1.0–0.4, adjusted HCP for notrump contracts
especially 3NT
-
BUM-RAP
: 4.5–3–1.5–0.75–0.25, adjusted HCP for suit contracts
-
NLTC
: Count 1.5–1.0–0.5 losers for each missing AKQ
NLTC is a good single hand evaluator but not very additive. It suits
preemptive initial actions but not for showing supports. I have a blog article
on that topic.
https://jdh8.org/nltc-a-good-single-hand-evaluator/
Stopper
We evaluate stopper quality as GIB does.
-
Partial stop
: length + HCP = 4
-
Likely stop
: length + HCP = 5
-
Stop
: A, QJx, or length + HCP at least 7
-
Two stops
: length + HCP at least 8
References
-
Thomas Andrews. [Thomas's Bridge Fantasia](https://bridge.thomasoandrews.com/valuations/)
-
Bridge Base. [GIB Bid Descriptions](https://www.bridgebase.com/doc/gib_descriptions.php)
Opening bids
-
∅
-
-
1
♦
|
11–15 HCP, 3+
♦
or MIN 3325
|
-
-
-
1NT
|
14–16 HCP, 2–4
♠
, 2–4
♥
, 2–6
♦
, 2–6
♣
|
-
2
♣
|
NAT UNBAL 5+
♣
, 11–16 HCP
|
-
-
-
-
-
3NT
|
!Gambling, SOL 7+m, 0–1 outside A/K
|
-
4
♣
|
!PRE, S-SOL 8+M, 0–1 outside A/K
|
-
4
♦
|
!PRE, SOL 8+M, no outside A/K
|
-
-
Note that we don't open 11 HCP balanced hands. Unlike aggressive sibling
systems, we keep our opening range narrow for easier responses.
Choice of suit openings
Contrary to popular belief, a modern Blue Club is pretty natural.
-
Treat two suiters longer than 5-5 as 5-5
-
Bid the longest suit
-
Bid the higher-ranking suit but choose 1
♥
for 4-4 in majors
Variants of the 2
♣
opening
We removed the balanced variant (332)5 from the 2
♣
opening. The remaining
variants are:
-
6+
♣
-
4M(xx)5 (but not 4M225, which is considered balanced)
We choose 1
♦
over 2
♣
for (xx)45 like most strong club systems.
Maximum canapé (14–15 HCP)
For maximum unbalanced opening hands, we open the secondary suit on purpose.
If there is a second round, opener reverses with the primary suit. However,
canapé cannot happen if either the primary or secondary suit is clubs because
2
♣
must be long.
-
5-5 or longer two suiter
: open the lower ranking suit if it is not clubs
-
(54) not involving clubs
: open the 4-card suit
-
4441
: open 1
♦
The notrump ladder
-
11–13
: 1
♦
♥
♠
-
14–16
: 1NT
-
17–19
: 1
♣
-1
♦
-1NT
-
20–22
: 1
♣
-1
♦
-1
♥
-1
♠
-1NT
-
23–24
: 1
♣
-1
♦
-1
♥
-1
♠
-2NT
-
25+
: 1
♣
-1
♦
-2NT
Strong 1
♣
opening
We use Polish style responses to the 1
♣
opening. These responses are
derived from
canapé style
in "PC - Meckwell Lite Precision Club" by
Edward Piwowar:
https://sites.google.com/view/bbaenglish/description-of-systems/pc-meckwell-lite-precision-club
-
1
♣
-
-
-
-
1NT
|
FG, 2–3
♠
, 2–3
♥
, 2–5
♦
, 2–5
♣
|
-
2
♣
|
FG, 5+
♣
, 0–3
♠
, 0–3
♥
|
-
2
♦
|
FG, 5+
♦
, 0–3
♠
, 0–3
♥
|
-
-
-
2NT
|
S/T, 2–3
♠
, 2–3
♥
, 2–5
♦
, 2–5
♣
, 11–13 HCP
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
♥
|
PRE, 7+
♥
4–7 HCP or 8+
♥
0–7 HCP
|
-
4
♠
|
PRE, 7+
♠
4–7 HCP or 8+
♠
0–7 HCP
|
These exactly 4-card 1M responses are canapé style, i.e. there can be a longer
side suit. With (54) in majors, we usually bid the 4-card major first.
However, with a 45(xx) mild slam try (11–13 HCP), we bid 2
♥
and then rebid
3
♠
.
Negative 1
♦
response
-
1
♣
-1
♦
-
-
-
1NT
|
BAL MIN, 17–19 HCP, 2–4
♠
, 2–4
♥
, 2–5
♦
, 2–5
♣
|
-
-
-
-
-
2NT
|
!FG, 2–5
♠
, 2–5
♥
, 2–5
♦
, 2–5
♣
|
-
-
-
-
-
3NT
|
!FG, 0–2
♠
, 0–2
♥
, 5+
♦
, 5+
♣
|
-
1
♣
-1
♦
-1
♥
-
-
-
2
♣
|
!MAX, 5–7 HCP, 0–1
♠
, 0–4
♥
|
-
2
♦
|
!MAX TRF, 5–7 HCP, 5+
♥
|
-
-
-
-
1
♣
-1
♦
-1
♥
-1
♠
-
1NT
|
BAL, 20–22 HCP, 2–4
♠
, 2–4
♥
, 2–5
♦
, 2–5
♣
|
-
-
-
-
2
♠
|
!FG, 4+
♠
, 4+
♥
, not BAL
|
-
2NT
|
BAL, 23–24 HCP, 2–4
♠
, 2–4
♥
, 2–5
♦
, 2–5
♣
|
-
-
-
3
♥
|
!FG, (41)44 or (40)(54)
|
-
3
♠
|
!FG FRAG, 3=
♠
, 0–1
♥
, 4–5
♦
, 4–5
♣
|
-
3NT
|
!FG FRAG, 0–1
♠
, 3=
♥
, 4–5
♦
, 4–5
♣
|
-
1
♣
-1
♦
-1
♠
-
-
-
-
2
♥
|
!MAX NF TRF, 5–7 HCP, 5+
♠
|
-
2
♠
|
!MAX, 5–7 HCP, 5+
♠
, 3=
♥
|
-
-
3
♣
|
!MAX, 5–7 HCP, 5+
♣
, 3=
♥
|
-
3
♦
|
!MAX, 5–7 HCP, 5+
♦
, 3=
♥
|
-
-
-
3NT
|
!Choice of games, 3433
|
-
-
-
Positive 2M responses
The 2M responses are game-forcing and show 5+ cards. Except 45(xx) mild slam
try, the other major is not exactly 4 cards.
Over 1
♣
-2
♥
, things are pretty natural. Over 1
♣
-2
♠
, however, bidding 3
♥
would be too high if we want to find both 5-3 and 6-2 fits. Therefore, we swap
the meanings of 3
♣
and 3
♥
.
-
1
♣
-2
♥
-
-
2NT
|
1–3
♥
, 2–4
♠
, 2–5
♦
, 2–5
♣
|
-
-
-
-
1
♣
-2
♠
-
2NT
|
1–3
♠
, 2–4
♥
, 2–5
♦
, 2–5
♣
|
-
-
-
-
-
1
♣
-2
♠
-3
♣
-
3
♦
|
!(R), 2+
♥
, 10–11 HCP or 8.0 NLTC if 3+
♥
|
-
-
-
-
4
♣
|
!S/T over non-serious SPL
♦
|
-
4
♦
|
!Non-serious SPL, 0–1
♣
|
-
4
♦
|
!S/T over non-serious SPL
♣
|
-
4
♣
|
!Serious SPL, 0–1
♣
, 3+
♥
|
-
4
♦
|
!Serious SPL, 0–1
♦
, 3+
♥
|
-
4
♥
|
!S/T, 3+
♥
, 12–13 HCP or 7.5 NLTC
|
With heart support over 1
♣
-2
♠
-3
♣
, there are several ways to reach 4
♥
. In
general, we want to cede declarership with a weak hand, so we assign weaker
support to bids with higher transfer rate. However, we can also reuse the
weakest forcing bid for strong hands (~2+ tricks above minimum) to save bidding
space.
-
3NT
: Minimum game force (8–9 HCP or 8.5 NLTC), non-serious Splinter (~
8–10 HCP), or strong slam try (14+ HCP or 7.0− NLTC)
-
3
♦
: 10–11 HCP or 8.0 NLTC
-
4
♥
: 12–13 HCP or 7.5 NLTC
-
4
♣
♦
: Serious Splinter (~ 11–13 HCP)
The 3M rebid sets the trump suit. If opener wants a choice of games, bid 2NT
instead.
-
1
♣
-2M-3M
-
1step
|
!ART, 8–9 HCP or 8.5 NLTC
|
-
2steps
|
!ART, 10–11 HCP or 8.0 NLTC
|
-
3steps
|
!ART, 12–13 HCP or 7.5 NLTC
|
-
4steps
|
!ART, 14–15 HCP or 7.0 NLTC
|
-
-
6steps
|
!RKCB 0314, 16+ HCP or 6.5− NLTC
|
Suggested defense
Our defense was derived from Terrorist's Moscito. We pass strong hands since we
are always given a chance to bid again. This is arguably the only sane usage of
coming out after a pass.
-
16+ HCP
: pass everything
-
11–15 HCP
: try bidding a major suit
-
4–10 HCP
: bid if you can
-
(1
♣
)
-
-
-
-
-
1NT
|
!PRE, 4+
♠
4+
♥
or 4+
♦
4+
♣
|
-
-
(1
♣
)-Dbl
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2NT
|
!TRF, FG 6+
♣
or PRE 7+
♣
|
-
3
♣
|
!TRF, FG 6+
♦
or PRE 7+
♦
|
-
3
♦
|
!TRF, mixed raise, UNBAL 4+
♥
|
-
-
(1
♣
)-1
♦
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2NT
|
!TRF, FG 6+
♣
or PRE 7+
♣
|
-
3
♣
|
!TRF, FG 6+
♦
or PRE 7+
♦
|
-
3
♦
|
!TRF, FG 6+
♥
or PRE 7+
♥
|
-
3
♥
|
!TRF, mixed raise, UNBAL 4+
♠
|
-
Competitive bidding
The strong club is fertile ground for bidding gadgets and psychic bids. We
ignore the meaning of overcalls in the first round for simplicity. Dealing
with just the nominal overcall also serves as a countermeasure against psychic
bids.
The following bidding structure is derived from Terrorist's Moscito. I changed
our natural 1M responses to exactly 4 cards.
-
It makes more sense to bid 4 cards at 1-level and 5+ cards at 2-level.
-
This also fits in our constructive bidding structure.
-
1
♣
-(1X)
-
-
-
-
2NT
|
!TRF, PRE 7+
♣
or MIN FG SOL 6+
♣
|
-
3
♣
|
!TRF, PRE 7+
♦
or MIN FG SOL 6+
♦
|
-
3
♦
|
!TRF, PRE 7+
♥
or MIN FG SOL 6+
♥
|
-
3
♥
|
!TRF, PRE 7+
♠
or MIN FG SOL 6+
♠
|
-
3
♠
|
!Gambling, SOL 7+ suit without stopper
|
-
3NT
|
!Gambling, SOL 7+ suit with stopper
|
As for (X), we use a similar approach to (1
♦
).
-
1
♣
-(Dbl)
-
-
1
♦
|
F, 4+
♦
, possibly MIN 5=M
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2NT
|
!TRF, PRE 7+
♣
or MIN FG SOL 6+
♣
|
-
3
♣
|
!TRF, PRE 7+
♦
or MIN FG SOL 6+
♦
|
-
3
♦
|
!TRF, PRE 7+
♥
or MIN FG SOL 6+
♥
|
-
3
♥
|
!TRF, PRE 7+
♠
or MIN FG SOL 6+
♠
|
-
3
♠
|
!Gambling, SOL 7+ suit without stopper
|
-
3NT
|
!Gambling, SOL 7+ suit with stopper
|
Competing over (1NT) is quite straightforward.
-
1
♣
-(1NT)
-
Dbl
|
INV+, 5+ HCP, fairly BAL
|
-
-
-
-
-
2NT
|
!FG CUE, usually 5+X 5+Y
|
-
-
-
-
-
3NT
|
!Gambling, SOL 7+ suit
|
The nature of 1
♣
-(2X) is similar to 1NT-(2X), yet there are some differences.
We use plain Rubinsohl instead of Transfer Lebensohl here. The 1
♣
opener is
unlimited and perhaps unbalanced. Preempting with a long suit is no longer
a good idea:
-
The preemptive value is overvalued due to a probable misfit.
-
Opener can bid again with extra values.
There is extra space over 1
♣
-(2
♣
), so we transfer at the 2-level as well.
-
1
♣
-(2
♣
)
-
Dbl
|
INV+, 5+ HCP, fairly BAL
|
-
-
-
2
♠
|
!NF T/O, usually 4=
♠
|
-
2NT
|
!G/T TRF, usually 6+
♦
|
-
-
-
3NT
|
Choice of games, 6+
♣
|
The 1
♦
opening
The only case opener has only 2 diamonds is 3325. Responder should assume that
opener has 3+ diamonds.
With normal responding strength (8+ HCP), responder always bids a natural major
suit first, even when there is a longer minor suit.
-
1
♦
-
-
-
1NT
|
NF, 4+
♣
or 9–11 HCP 3343
|
-
2
♣
|
!F, Multi:
|
(a) NAT FG, 4+
♣
, 0–3
♠
, 0–3
♥
|
(b) PRE TRF, 0–7 HCP, 4–5
♦
|
(c) PRE, 0–7 HCP, 6+M
|
-
2
♦
|
CONST, 8–9 HCP, 4–5
♦
|
-
2
♥
|
!INV+, 10+ HCP, 4+
♦
, shows
♥
stopper or asks for
♠
stopper
|
-
2
♠
|
!INV+, 10+ HCP, 4+
♦
, shows
♠
stopper or asks for
♥
stopper
|
-
2NT
|
!F PRE, 0–7 HCP, 5+
♦
|
-
3
♣
|
!F, mixed raise, 8–9 HCP, unbalanced 5+
♦
|
-
-
3
♥
|
Choice of games, 6+
♥
|
-
3
♠
|
Choice of games, 6+
♠
|
-
-
1
♦
-2
♣
-
-
-
2
♠
|
!P/C, 4+
♥
or MAX 3=
♥
|
-
2NT
|
!F, MAX, 3+
♠
, 3+
♥
, 4+
♦
|
-
3
♣
|
!F, MIN SPL, 1=
♣
, 3+
♠
, 3+
♥
, 5+
♦
|
-
3
♦
|
!NF, MIN FRAG, 0=
♣
, 3+
♠
, 3+
♥
, 5+
♦
|
The 1M responses
-
1
♦
-1
♥
-
1
♠
|
4+
♠
, can be MAX 4441
|
-
-
2
♣
|
4+
♣
, can be MAX 3154
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
♦
-1
♠
-
-
2
♣
|
4+
♣
, can be MAX 1354
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Major suit openings
Our major suit raises mix length and strength together to make them difficult to
compete.
-
Single raise
: weak 4+ cards or constructive (~7–9 HCP) 3 cards. Opener
only rebids unbalanced maximum hands.
-
Double raise
: invitation that can contain fewer points with a better fit.
Opener bids game with all maximums and good minimums.
-
Bid 2
♣
first
: with something in between. Opener rebids above 2M with
maximum hands. You can filter maximum hands again.
-
Jacoby 2NT
: game force with 4+ cards.
-
Jump to game
: signoff with 5+ cards. Bid 2NT with exactly 4 cards for a
possible better fit or 3NT.
-
1
♥
-
1
♠
|
F, 3+
♠
, usually 4+
♠
|
-
1NT
|
NF, 9–11 HCP, 0–3
♠
, 0–3
♥
|
-
2
♣
|
!NAT FG, CONST 4=
♥
, or INV 3=
♥
. Not 4=
♠
|
-
-
2
♥
|
PRE 4+
♥
or CONST 3=
♥
|
-
-
-
-
-
3
♥
|
INV 4+
♥
or CONST 5+
♥
|
-
-
3NT
|
!Choice of games, 3(433), 12–15 HCP
|
-
-
-
We respond to 1
♠
with Twisted 2/1 by Ting-Yu Ye (TpKotoba). I simplify 2
♣
to
contain 5+ hearts always. This method is similar to Kaplan Interchange.
https://hackmd.io/@TpKotoba/refx
-
1
♠
-
-
-
2
♦
|
!FG 4+
♣
, CONST 4=
♠
, or INV 3=
♠
|
-
-
2
♠
|
PRE 4+
♠
or CONST 3=
♠
|
-
-
-
-
-
3
♠
|
INV 4+
♠
or CONST 5+
♠
|
-
3NT
|
!Choice of games, (4333), 12–15 HCP
|
-
-
Since 1
♠
-2
♣
generally asks for 2+ hearts to sign off, I advise responding 1NT
with an invitation with 5= hearts and 0–2 spades to query minimum 3+ hearts.
I simplify rebids to a minor suit game force. Rebidding 2NT shows a minimum
with hearts.
In this bidding system of limited openings, opener usually wants to reverse with
a maximum. However, keep in mind that there are hands with nowhere to jump over
1NT:
-
Balanced (5332)
: rebid the major suit like minimum 6+ cards.
-
(4441)
: bid the lowest 4-card suit if no fit is found yet.
BTU 1NT
This bidding system has a strong notrump opening (14+ HCP) that does not
contain a 5-card major. We use the BTU continuations after the 1NT opening.
Stayman takes care of invitation with 5+ spades.
-
1NT
-
2
♣
|
!STAY, Garbage STAY, or INV 5=
♠
|
-
-
-
2
♠
|
!Minor suit Multi/STAY, 6+m or FG 4+
♦
4+
♣
|
-
-
3
♣
|
INV, 6+
♣
, KQxxxx or better, usually 6–7 HCP
|
-
3
♦
|
INV, 6+
♦
, KQxxxx or better, usually 6–7 HCP
|
-
-
3
♠
|
!Choice of games, 5+
♠
, 5+
♥
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
5NT
|
!F to a 5-card suit or 6NT
|
-
7
♣
|
!P/C to a 5-card suit or 7NT
|
-
-
-
Stayman
Stayman has multiple variants in BTU 1NT:
-
Weak: T/O with short clubs (Garbage Stayman)
-
INV: 4–5
♠
or 4=
♥
(BTU)
-
FG: 4=
♠
or 4=
♥
-
S/T: 5+
♠
and 5+
♥
(BTU/jdh8)
We employ Smolen at both levels to take care of spade invitation.
-
1NT-2
♣
-2
♦
-
-
2
♠
|
NF INV Smolen, 4=
♠
, 5+
♥
|
-
-
-
-
3
♥
|
!FG, Smolen TRF, 54(xx)
|
-
3
♠
|
!FG, Smolen TRF, 45(xx)
|
-
-
4
♦
|
!Texas TRF, 6+
♥
, 4+
♠
|
-
4
♥
|
!Texas TRF, 6+
♠
, 4+
♥
|
-
-
-
-
1NT-2
♣
-2
♥
-
-
-
3
♣
|
FG, 5+
♣
, 0–3
♥
, 4=
♠
|
-
3
♦
|
FG, 5+
♦
, 0–3
♥
, 4=
♠
|
-
-
-
4
♣
|
!S/T SPL, 0–1
♣
, 4+
♥
|
-
4
♦
|
!S/T SPL, 0–1
♦
, 4+
♥
|
-
-
4NT
|
QUANT INV to 6NT, 0–3
♥
|
-
5NT
|
QUANT INV to 7NT, 0–3
♥
|
-
1NT-2
♣
-2
♠
-
-
3
♣
|
FG, 5+
♣
, 0–3
♠
, 4=
♥
|
-
3
♦
|
FG, 5+
♦
, 0–3
♠
, 4=
♥
|
-
-
-
4
♣
|
!S/T SPL, 0–1
♣
, 4+
♠
|
-
4
♦
|
!S/T SPL, 0–1
♦
, 4+
♠
|
-
4
♥
|
!S/T SPL, 0–1
♥
, 4+
♠
|
-
4NT
|
QUANT INV to 6NT, 0–3
♠
|
-
5NT
|
QUANT INV to 7NT, 0–3
♠
|
Jacoby transfer
The opener always accepts Jacoby transfers. We super-accept with maximum and 4
trumps. We
hide
the doubleton just below the trump to avoid retransferring
problems like 1NT-2
♦
-3
♦
!-3
♥
?.
-
1NT-2
♦
-2
♥
-
-
-
3
♠
|
!Choice of games, 3=
♥
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Minor suit Multi/Stayman
We can take care of all interesting hands with minor suits by 2
♠
and paradox
advances. Responder rebids a major suit for Splinter. Opener can reject 3NT
with P/C.
Competitive bidding
Competition does not affect auctions at 3NT and above.
Over (Dbl)
We keep things simple over a strong double (10+ HCP). Everything is natural.
Over (2
♣
)
We play
systems on
over 1NT-(2
♣
). Most bids keep the same meaning. This is
because 2
♣
is so low that we can treat it as (mirrored) (1
♣
)-1NT.
-
If there is no anchor suit, we completely ignore the 2
♣
bid.
-
With one anchor suit X, we treat it as (1X)-1NT, where
systems on
also
applies.
-
With a major and a minor anchor suits, we ignore the minor suit.
-
1NT-(2
♣
)
-
Dbl
|
!STAY, may be Garbage
|
-
-
-
2
♠
|
!TRF, 6+
♣
or BAL INV
|
-
We recommend Leaping Michaels over a sole anchor suit. Take natural clubs for
example.
-
1NT-(2
♣
)
-
3
♣
|
!INV+, 6+
♦
, at most partial stop in
♣
|
-
-
-
The real headache is when (2
♣
) shows both majors e.g. Landy. We recommend
reverse unusual vs. unusual.
-
1NT-(2
♣
)
-
Dbl
|
Suggest penalizing either major
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Note that we pass when we can penalize both majors. A delayed double is for
penalty since a takeout can usually penalize the other major.
Over (2
♦
♥
♠
)
We play Transfer Lebensohl against overcalls 2
♦
♥
♠
.
-
1NT-(2
♦
)
-
-
-
-
-
3
♦
|
!FG, 5+
♣
, at most partial stop in
♦
|
-
3
♥
|
!FG, 5+
♥
, likely stop in
♦
|
-
3
♠
|
!FG, 5+
♠
, likely stop in
♦
|
-
3NT
|
!FG, 5+
♣
, likely stop in
♦
|
-
-
3
♥
|
!P/C, MAX, 4+
♦
, 4+
♣
|
-
-
-
-
-
3NT
|
S/O, likely stop in
♦
|
-
1NT-(2
♥
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
♥
|
!FG, 5+
♣
, at most partial stop in
♥
|
-
3
♠
|
!FG, 5+
♠
, likely stop in
♥
|
-
3NT
|
!FG, 5+
♣
, likely stop in
♥
|
-
-
3
♥
|
!P/C, MAX, 4+
♦
, 4+
♣
|
-
-
-
-
-
3NT
|
S/O, likely stop in
♥
|
-
1NT-(2
♠
)
-
-
-
-
-
3
♠
|
!FG, 5+
♣
, at most partial stop in
♠
|
-
3NT
|
!FG, 5+
♣
, likely stop in
♠
|
-
-
3
♥
|
!P/C, MAX, 4+
♦
, 4+
♣
|
-
-
-
-
-
3NT
|
S/O, likely stop in
♠
|
Over (2NT)
We have a special unusual vs. unusual structure over 1NT-(2NT) because we have
not yet shown a suit.
-
1NT-(2NT)
-
Dbl
|
INV+, 2–4
♠
, 2–4
♥
, 2+
♦
, 2+
♣
|
-
-
-
-
The 2
♣
opening
Our 2
♣
opening is heavily influenced by Precision Club and Polish Club.
-
2
♣
-
-
-
-
3
♣
|
MAX, 6+
♣
, 0–3
♠
, 0–3
♥
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
♣
-2NT-3
♣
-
-
3NT
|
Choice of games, 4+
♣
|
Multi 2
♦
Our Multi 2
♦
shows a 6-card weak two of either major.
Muiderberg 2M
Weak twos in this bidding system show exactly 5 cards in the bid major and a
side minor suit. Multi 2
♦
already takes care of 6+ cards.
Unusual 2NT opening
The unusual 2NT opening is a preempt with 5+
♦
and 5+
♣
.
We advise against opening 2NT for (30)55 in the first two seats.
-
2NT
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4NT
|
!Equal preference between 5
♣
♦
|
-
2NT-3
♠
-3NT
-
-
-
5
♣
|
!S/T, 3+
♣
, voluntary bid
|
-
5
♦
|
!S/T, 3+
♦
, voluntary bid
|
BTU 4-level preempts
In National Taiwan University Bridge Club (BTU), we use a 4X scheme that
conveys approximately 0.58 more bits than traditional or Meckwell Namyats.
-
4
♣
: solid major suit without any outside A/K
-
4
♦
: semi-solid major suit with 0–1 outside A/K
-
4M
: non-solid (1.5+ NLTC) major suit
-
4
♣
-
-
-
4NT
|
!MAX, CTRL in every side suit
|
-
5m
|
!MAX, no CTRL in this suit
|
-